Log In | Register
Previous Bon marché moncler chaussures rugby league participant Ryan Tandy, who has presently Newcastle been fined for match-correcting, could now go to jail for lying to the Crime Commission about the NRL betting scandal.
Right after magistrate Clare Farnan located Tandy responsible of one of a few fees, she warned that the authorities are rather crystal clear that imprisonment need to be total-time for lying under oath.
Ms Farnan located that the ex-NRL player had offered false proof in January to the NSW Crime Commission about his betting pursuits with jockey manager John Schell.
Mr Tandy's proof just before me was not amazing, the magistrate said on Friday in the Downing Centre Regional Court.
She explained the thirty-12 months-old would obtain no sentence other than imprisonment .
Nonetheless, she has ordered that Tandy be assessed for an Intensive Correction Buy (ICO), a sentencing option that changed saturday and sunday detention including group provider Mexican Primera Division , stringent supervision, drug testing and doable curfews.
If Tandy is discovered suitable for an ICO, Tandy might steer clear of heading to jail, though the magistrate explained an ICO was tantamount to imprisonment.
In Oct, Tandy was discovered guilty of match-repairing and was fined $4000 and placed on a twelve-month good behaviour bond for interfering with the final result of a game in between the Canterbury Bulldogs and the North Queensland Cowboys in August 2010.
He is interesting the determination Mexican Primera Division .
Tandy was acquitted of two of the fees relating to evidence he gave the Crime Commission in its investigation of match-fixing.
One related to evidence he gave about inserting a wager on an NRL video game he was involved in amongst the Canterbury Bulldogs and the Gold Coast Titans on June eighteen, 2010.
The other related to evidence he gave about having a conversation with Bulldogs participant Michael Hodgson about his place on the field for the sport that became the subject of the investigation.
The judge was happy Tandy had not knowingly lied about the pre-game conversation and said there was insufficient proof he had knowingly lied about placing NRL bets.
During a two-week interval in 2010, Tandy positioned a number of bets with a skilled punter named Damien Flower by way of Mr Schell.
When questioned by the Crime Commission when he had last utilised a bookmaker or any other person who was gambling , Tandy replied that he could not give a time due to the fact it was many years ago .
He conceded that sometimes mates put bets on for him and he named Michael Cook and former Dragons teammate Hassan Saleh.
When asked straight if Mr Schell was a mate, Mr Tandy mentioned no.
Ms Farnan rejected Tandy's evidence that he had forgotten about Mr Schell.
Tandy will understand his fate on Friday, January thirteen.
